jorge.burgos/rc-migration-tests
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Improve documentation

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jorge Burgos 2025-02-06 14:17:15 -05:00
parent 5b6d15248e
commit a23898a70b
1 changed files with 60 additions and 254 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

314
ef-migration/src/Strata.Code.DataAccess/ReadMe.MD
View File

@ -191,202 +191,21 @@ var linkedSettings = await _repository.GetByLinksAsync(
- AutoMapper
- FluentValidation
## Timeline Estimation
| Phase | Duration | Description |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| Planning | 1-2 weeks | Analysis, strategy, tooling setup |
| Basic Migration | 2-4 weeks | Entity and schema migration |
| Query Migration | 4-6 weeks | Converting complex queries |
| Testing | 2-3 weeks | Integration and performance testing |
| Deployment | 1-2 weeks | Staging and production deployment |
## Consumer Impact Analysis
### Changes in Consumer Code
#### Dependency Injection (DI)
```csharp
// Core20 - Static access
var setting = BudgetConfigDefaultSetting.LoadBySettingID(123);
// EF Core - DI approach
public class ConsumerService
{
private readonly IBudgetConfigDefaultSettingRepository _repository;
public ConsumerService(IBudgetConfigDefaultSettingRepository repository)
{
_repository = repository;
}
public async Task<BudgetConfigDefaultSetting> GetSetting(int id)
{
return await _repository.GetByIdAsync(id);
}
}
```
#### Async/Await Pattern
```csharp
// Core20 - Synchronous
var settings = BudgetConfigDefaultSetting.LoadAll();
settings.First().Name = "New Name";
settings.First().Save();
// EF Core - Async
var settings = await _repository.GetAllAsync();
var setting = settings.First();
setting.Name = "New Name";
await _repository.UpdateAsync(setting);
```
### Comprehensive Usage Examples
#### 1. Basic CRUD Operations
```csharp
// Create
var newSetting = new BudgetConfigDefaultSetting
{
Name = "New Feature Flag",
Description = "Controls new feature availability",
DefaultValue = true
};
await _repository.CreateAsync(newSetting);
// Read
var setting = await _repository.GetByIdAsync(newSetting.SettingId);
var allSettings = await _repository.GetAllAsync();
var featureFlags = await _repository.GetByNameAsync("Feature Flag");
// Update
setting.DefaultValue = false;
await _repository.UpdateAsync(setting);
// Delete
await _repository.DeleteAsync(setting.SettingId);
```
#### 2. Complex Queries
```csharp
// Finding settings with complex conditions
var customSettings = await _repository.FindByAsync(s =>
s.Name.StartsWith("Custom") &&
s.DefaultValue == true &&
s.DateCreated >= DateOnly.FromDateTime(DateTime.Today.AddDays(-30))
);
// Working with related entities
public class CategoryService
{
private readonly IBudgetConfigDefaultSettingRepository _repository;
private readonly OnePlanDbContext _context;
public async Task<IEnumerable<BudgetConfigDefaultSetting>> GetSettingsForCategory(int categoryId)
{
// Using type-safe LINQ approach
return await _repository.GetByLinksAsync(
_context.CategorySettings.Where(cs => cs.CategoryId == categoryId),
link => link.SettingId
);
}
}
```
#### 3. Batch Operations
```csharp
public class BulkOperationService
{
private readonly IBudgetConfigDefaultSettingRepository _repository;
public async Task UpdateFeatureFlags(bool newValue)
{
var featureFlags = await _repository.FindByAsync(s =>
s.Name.Contains("FeatureFlag"));
foreach (var flag in featureFlags)
{
flag.DefaultValue = newValue;
await _repository.UpdateAsync(flag);
}
}
}
```
#### 4. Validation and Error Handling
```csharp
public class SettingManagementService
{
private readonly IBudgetConfigDefaultSettingRepository _repository;
public async Task<(bool success, string message)> CreateSetting(BudgetConfigDefaultSetting setting)
{
try
{
if (!_repository.ValidateSetting(setting, out var errors))
{
return (false, $"Validation failed: {string.Join(", ", errors)}");
}
var created = await _repository.CreateAsync(setting);
return (true, $"Setting created with ID: {created.SettingId}");
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
return (false, $"Error creating setting: {ex.Message}");
}
}
}
```
#### 5. Working with Links and Relationships
```csharp
public class SettingRelationshipService
{
private readonly IBudgetConfigDefaultSettingRepository _repository;
private readonly OnePlanDbContext _context;
// Using navigation properties
public async Task<IEnumerable<BudgetConfigDefaultSetting>> GetLinkedSettings<TEntity>(
Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> linkCondition,
Expression<Func<TEntity, BudgetConfigDefaultSetting>> navigationProperty)
where TEntity : class
{
return await _repository.GetByLinkedEntityAsync(
linkCondition,
navigationProperty
);
}
// Example usage
public async Task<IEnumerable<BudgetConfigDefaultSetting>> GetDepartmentSettings(int departmentId)
{
return await GetLinkedSettings<DepartmentSetting>(
ds => ds.DepartmentId == departmentId,
ds => ds.Setting
);
}
}
```
### Key Consumer Benefits
1. **Type Safety**: Better IDE support and compile-time error checking
2. **Performance**: Async operations and efficient query generation
3. **Maintainability**: Cleaner, more testable code through DI
4. **Flexibility**: Enhanced querying capabilities through LINQ
5. **Reliability**: Built-in connection and transaction management
## AI Assistance for Migration
### Using Claude for Migration Support
### Using AI Tools for Migration Support
Claude can significantly accelerate the migration process through intelligent code analysis and transformation. Here are effective prompting strategies:
The migration process can be significantly accelerated using Claude and WindSurf. Here's how to effectively leverage these tools:
### Using Claude for Architecture and Analysis
Claude excels at high-level analysis and providing detailed implementation guidance. Here are effective prompting strategies:
#### Example 1: Initial Analysis Prompt
```
I need to migrate a Core20 ORM implementation to EF Core 8.0. Here are my source files:
[Paste your Core20 files here]
[Paste your Core20 files]
Please:
1. Analyze the current implementation
@ -410,30 +229,22 @@ Requirements:
5. Show example service layer integration
```
### Using GitHub Copilot
### Using WindSurf for Code Generation
WindSurf is particularly effective for handling specific code generation tasks. Here's how to use it effectively:
1. **Repository Migration**
```csharp
// Copilot prompt in comments:
// Convert this Core20 repository to EF Core 8.0:
// [Paste original repository code]
public class MyEntityRepository
{
// Let Copilot suggest the implementation
}
// WindSurf prompt:
// Generate EF Core repository for this Core20 entity:
// [Insert entity details]
```
2. **Entity Configuration**
```csharp
// Copilot prompt in comments:
// Create EF Core fluent configuration for this entity:
// [Paste entity properties]
public class MyEntityConfiguration : IEntityTypeConfiguration<MyEntity>
{
// Let Copilot suggest the configuration
}
// WindSurf prompt:
// Create EF Core entity configuration class for:
// [Insert schema details]
```
### Best Practices for AI-Assisted Migration
@ -444,10 +255,16 @@ Requirements:
- Create test cases before migration
2. **Prompting Strategy**
- Start with high-level architecture
- Break down into specific components
- Include context and constraints
- Request examples for complex patterns
- Use Claude for:
* Architecture decisions
* Pattern analysis
* Complex transformations
* Documentation generation
- Use WindSurf for:
* Code generation
* Schema translations
* LINQ query conversions
* Repetitive transformations
3. **Validation Process**
- Review AI-generated code thoroughly
@ -455,57 +272,46 @@ Requirements:
- Verify performance characteristics
- Check security implications
4. **Iterative Improvement**
```
Prompt Template:
"The current implementation of [feature] in EF Core needs improvement.
Current code:
[paste code]
Required improvements:
1. [specific improvement]
2. [specific improvement]
Please provide an optimized version maintaining these constraints: [list constraints]"
```
### AI Tools Comparison for Migration Tasks
| Task | Claude | GitHub Copilot | Best Practice |
| Task | Claude | WindSurf | Best Practice |
|------|---------|---------------|---------------|
| Architecture Analysis | Excellent | Limited | Use Claude for initial analysis |
| Code Conversion | Good | Excellent | Use Copilot with Claude's guidance |
| Pattern Recognition | Excellent | Good | Start with Claude, refine with Copilot |
| Documentation | Excellent | Limited | Use Claude for docs generation |
| Edge Cases | Good | Limited | Use Claude to identify, Copilot to implement |
| Architecture Analysis | Excellent | Limited | Use Claude |
| Code Generation | Good | Excellent | Use WindSurf with Claude's guidance |
| Pattern Recognition | Excellent | Good | Start with Claude, implement with WindSurf |
| Documentation | Excellent | Limited | Use Claude |
| Edge Cases | Good | Good | Use both tools complementarily |
### Velocity Optimization Tips
### Tool-Specific Best Practices
1. **Parallel Processing**
- Use AI to generate multiple implementations
- Human review focuses on architecture and edge cases
- AI handles repetitive conversions
#### Claude
- Provide complete context
- Ask for step-by-step explanations
- Request multiple approaches
- Use for architectural decisions
2. **Template Generation**
```
Prompt Template for New Entities:
"Convert this Core20 entity to EF Core:
[entity code]
Include:
1. Entity configuration
2. Repository implementation
3. Service layer
4. Required interfaces
5. Example usage"
```
#### WindSurf
- Focus on specific code generation tasks
- Use for repetitive transformations
- Leverage for LINQ query conversions
- Apply to schema migrations
3. **Quality Assurance**
- Use AI to generate test cases
- Automated validation of patterns
- Performance benchmark comparisons
### Recommended Workflow
1. **Analysis Phase (Claude)**
- System architecture review
- Pattern identification
- Migration strategy development
2. **Implementation Phase (WindSurf)**
- Code generation
- Entity configurations
- Repository implementations
3. **Validation Phase (Both)**
- Code review
- Test case execution
- Performance validation
## Conclusion
The migration from Core20 to EF Core represents a significant modernization effort that will result in more maintainable, type-safe, and performant code. While consumers will need to adapt to the async/await pattern and dependency injection approach, the benefits include better tooling support, improved development experience, and more reliable data access patterns. The provided examples demonstrate how the new repository pattern provides a more robust and flexible way to interact with the data layer.
By leveraging AI tools effectively, the migration process can be significantly accelerated while maintaining high quality standards. The key is to use each tool's strengths appropriately and maintain a consistent validation process throughout the migration.
The migration from Core20 to EF Core represents a significant modernization effort that will result in more maintainable, type-safe, and performant code. By leveraging Claude for strategic planning and WindSurf for implementation, teams can significantly accelerate the migration process while maintaining high quality standards. The key is to use each tool's strengths appropriately and maintain a consistent validation process throughout the migration.